Blogging Docs catching on?

images
About 1% of all blogs deal with health, according to a 2006 study by the Pew Internet & American Life Project. Many are by consumers writing about their own health issues, but "the numbers of health care providers who are blogging is steadily growing," says Fard Johnmar, founder of Envision Solutions, a New York health care marketing firm. Why not Blog? As hard as it to believe physicians are people too and are as confused about healthcare issues as we all are. Read More...
|

Building a blockbuster without DTC

22diabetes_600x262
With the annual market for diabetes drugs expected to reach at least $25 billion worldwide by 2011, up from $15 billion today, drug makers have been investing heavily in new approaches to treating diabetes. With the recent troubles of oral agents injectable medications are now gaining more attention including Byetta which has quietly seen its market share increase without substantial DTC because of world of mouth about one of Byetta's side effects...weight loss. Read More...
|

Actually it's quite simple, it's about patients

images
Last week one of the readers to my BLOG sent me an eMail that said simply; your the only person I know in the industry who really cares about patients. While I took this as a huge compliment it is also indicative of the sorry state of current DTC and the perception that pharma only really cares about their balance sheets not patient safety and health. Read More...
|

DTC National Awards = worthless

images
Ahhh yes. That time of year when the DTC Perspectives issue arrives with the "Top 25 DTC Marketers" which surely has to be an oxymoron. This trade magazine is such a joke that nobody in the industry really takes it seriously. It's news is shallow and outdated and, judging from the list of the top 25 marketers, its selection criteria is based more upon relationships within the industry than what anyone has actually done, or has not done. Read More...
|

How to waste $100 million

rozerem_art_200_20070605145700
According to an article in today's Chicago Tribune Rozerem is "barely making a dent" in the prescription sleep market (DUH!). Let's see spend over $100 dollars on a DTC campaign that is horribly bad and then sit back and wonder why you have not made a dent in the sleep market? Earth to Takeda: It's about the point of difference NOT the fact that Abe Lincoln and a beaver say your dreams miss you ! Read More...
|

Price Waterhouse Coopers: Non-compliance costing pharma billions?

screenshot_04
I enjoy reading analyst reports from financial companies. They are great for making me laugh as a lot of the insights are DUH 101 and have no basis in reality. A perfect example is the latest report issued by PWC titled "Pharma 2020: The Vision, Which Path Will You Take? CEO's can just throw away their strategic plans and use this as a roadmap to company enlightenment and riches. Among other things, the report explains that pharma is leaving over $3 billion on the table because of noncompliance of patients. (DUH) It took how many high paid analysts to figure this out? Read More...
|

Opening statements

images
Well it take long for me to get some eMail on my last post. Thank you for responding and raising some great issues, but for a moment put yourself in a patients shoes. You are a Type 2 diabetic doing well on Avandia and really don't want to switch to another medication. As a patient what I would want to know is; what are the risks of a heart attack on Avandia, and what are my risks for a heart attack on Avandia? I would want to know the percentage of patients in ongoing clinical trials that had issues and if these issues were due to the medication or other risk factors including weight, family history of heart disease and high cholesterol. So the questions remain for GSK and the FDA to answer. Read More...
|

The vultures pounce

images
What do sperm and lawyers have in common? One in ten million has a chance of becoming a human being. The legal profession overlooks no opportunity to chase an ambulance and make a few dollars. The latest? A class actions suit by investors against GSK alleging the drug company misled investors about the safety of diabetes drug Avandia, a step investors have taken in past drug-safety disputes. This of course while there is still dispute over the what the data actually says but no matter lawyers are already recruiting patients from TV ads for class action against GSK. Read More...
|

Credibility? We don't need no credibility !

cred
A while back we conducted two days of research with people who have diabetes. The subject of credibility seemed to come up again and again when discussing their informational needs to help them decide on treatment options. It comes down to this: people want clear and concise information on the product, its side effects and want promotional information to be separated from medical information. (DUH!) Well as the battle over Avandia, and now Actos, intensifies some publications are theorizing that GSK may have manipulated data to meet marketing objectives. From an editorial in today's New York Times:

One disturbing possibility is that Glaxo has designed tests that have the effect of meeting the company’s marketing objectives while minimizing risks. The F.D.A. may have allowed itself to be outmaneuvered, approving designs that won’t fully answer key safety questions.

Read More...
|

Well it's started

images
Well the fallout from potential FDA scrutiny of new drug applications has started. This author has learned that several pharma companies are already planning to kill or postpone new drugs in development because of the increased cost and time of development to ensure approval. While the FDA bows to political pressure patients who might have benefitted from these drugs will have to find possible treatments elsewhere. At a time when the FDA is going to demand more data and more clinical trials the business of drug development will become even more about ROI and less about patients. Read More...
|

Politicizing science

images
What a mess ! That's the only way to think of the black box warnings that were added to Avandia and Actos. The hearings yesterday resembled a circus with finger pointing and clear lines of difference between Democrats and Republicans on the data that was first reported in the NEJM. What are physicians and patients supposed to think? Is the data telling us the glass is half full or half empty? Rather than utilizing the opinions of third parties, namely physicians who have no vested interest in the product, politicians took it among themselves to interpret data mispronouncing words along the way. This is what happens when politics is mixed with science and this is going to have broad implications for patients and the pharmaceutical industry for years to come. Read More...
|

The beat goes on

screenshot_02
Well the finger pointing continues with the Avandia data with continued media coverage most recently on the front page of today's New York Times. While some doctors are taking a 'wait and see" attitude it seems that GSK has already started to feel the effects of this story with declining sales. Meanwhile what are patients expected to think? Accusations and counter accusations are flying back and forth which has done little to make patients comfortable with treatment for Type II diabetes. Read More...
|