Media (Internet)
The breeze is blowing by...
images-2
Well it's started...WPP purchased Real Media for $650 million...Microsoft acquired Avenue A/Razorfish and that is just the start of what traditional agencies are coming to realize "The Internet is where most advertisers want to be". Do you hear that pharma marketers? Still want to waste money on TV with little ROI while ignoring the web? The problem of course is that unless you have real eMarketing people on board this trend is going to pass you by like a cool breeze on a hot summer night.


According to an article in today's
New York Times;

Big brand advertisers like Procter & Gamble and Johnson & Johnson are increasingly shifting their advertising budgets away from traditional media like television and newspapers to digital advertising on the Internet. As that money moves online, the WPP Group and other traditional advertising companies are at risk of losing their grip over the creation and sales of ads.



“This really heightens the tension between ad agencies and technology companies as they both try to go after the ad dollars that are migrating online,” said Youssef Squali, the Internet analyst at Jefferies & Company.



Well it seems once again as the environment is changing pharma is on the trailing edge. At a time when they are trying to build consumer marketing competencies eMarketing is really starting to grow in both people and investments. TV is a has been who never was, expect maybe before the age of empowered consumers. Yet I am sure that marketers will continue to pour millions of dollars into TV because they don't understand the Web and the power that consumers now have. Data will be manipulated to show outrageous ROI's on TV while ignoring the fact that the Web actually drives conversion.

This is just the start of the paradigm shift from traditional marketing channels to the new media of consumer engagement with brands. Pharma marketers are caught like a deer in the headlights and don't know what to do. Product websites will continue to "push" information to consumers and they will largely ignore Web 2.0 until Web 3.0 starts to take off. Too bad....maybe somewhere pharma will wake up and realize that IT people do not make good eMarketing people and that TV is a waste of ad dollars.


|
Prevention Magazine shines dim light on consumer behavior
prevention051507
The headlines scream.. "Most consumers use Internet to compare drug benefits, so marketers need to be aware of what other sites are saying". Can I say it..you know I really want to say it...DUH ! How ignorant does Prevention magazines Rodale Press think marketers are? Ooopss..I forgot we're talking about DTC marketers..never-mind.



"The No. 1 change in consumers in the last 10 years is their ability to access information on the web," said Carey Silvers, director-consumer and advertising trends at Rodale. Earth to Carey..every marketer knows this and the ones that don't should not be in marketing. Click stream analysis, which is offered via a number of services like Hitwise, continually shows that consumers use the Web for research and will often go to competitors sites when researching medications. This is understanding consumer behavior on the Web 101.


In other areas, the survey found:


• Only 8% of consumers say they are stimulated to ask their doctors for a specific medicine after seeing it advertised, most "just talk." Again DUH...physicians are often the gate keepers and consumers will take what their physicians advise.


• Most consumers say they know a lot about their medical condition or illness (68%), the benefits of prescription medicines they take (67%) and the risks (59%).


• Even after a prescription is filled, most consumers (75%) keep looking for more information about their medication. Many of those people (29%) still peruse related advertising. Again marketers should know this. I have found that a lot of people go to product.com websites AFTER they get an Rx to learn about potential side effects and how the medications work. Why are the doing this? Because physicians don't have the time to discuss medications in length with patients.


• More than half of consumers, 57%, agree or somewhat agree that DTC ads are done responsibly, a 2% gain over last year's results.


• Most consumers "agree" or "somewhat agree" that direct-to-consumer drug ads allow people to be more involved in their healthcare. How else are they going to be informed about new pharma products.


• Some 56% of consumers are on prescription medicine, up from 47% in the study 10 years ago. Let's see baby-boomers aging = more Rx's


These insights are blindingly obvious to anyone and is no big deal but lets be honest here, the purpose of this study is to swing more dollars towards Rodale publications at a time when marketers are demanding better metrics from print and TV advertising. When we used to get the Rodale study we would toss it aside as the findings were DTC marketing 101..great for a summer intern but that's about it
.
|
The Internet bringing wired physicians together at last
screenshot_03
It looks like a physicians portal has finally got it right and figured out that the power of the Web to bring people together and collarborate can lead to success. Sermo.com now has over 10,000 physicians registered and judging from recent posts to the site it looks like the their slogan is right "Why consult with one collegue when you can consult with thousands?".



According to a recent article in
Digital Communications;


screenshot_02


Sermo.com is the fastest growing online community created by physicians, for physicians, today announced that it has exceeded the 10,000 registered physicians mark -- just six months after launching. Growing at a rate of more than 600 physicians per week, Sermo has become the "go to" destination for physicians nationwide to share observations from their practices and exchange medical insights as they are happening. U.S. doctors logged more than 6,000 hours and viewed nearly 1 million pages on Sermo in March alone, as they shared the latest observations from the front lines of medicine about the effectiveness of drugs, devices and treatments.


What a great idea and a great tool for wired physicians who are time pressed to attend meetings and conferences. Here are some of the recent posts on Sermo.com;


* Can Gabapentin be used for hot flashes?
* Given the injuries associated with chiropractic care, do you refer your patients to chiropractors?
* Have you seen hearing loss caused by Azithromycin?
* Which is the best quinolone for respiratory infections?
* Do you examine older kids and adolescents without a parent present?
* Do you agree with Novartis discontinuing Zelnorm?
* Have you experienced compassion fatigue?
* With new drugs coming to market all the time how long do you like to wait before prescribing them?
* Is it ethical to Google your patients?
* Is Cymbalta good for Fibromyalgia?
* Which Brand Name Drugs are better than Generics?
* FDA sleeping pill warnings -- Have they gone too far?


As you can see there are some pretty good subjects being addressed here by physicians who are hungry to collaborate with other HCP's. The post on compassion fatigue is especially interesting given that physicians have to see a lot of patients during the day and may not have the time they would like to site and counsel patients on treatment conditions and issues.

screenshot_01



This is a great example of Web 2.0, using the Internet to bring people together rather than push information. It's long over due and pharma should take notice of this great site because this is just a small example of how the pharmaceutical industry can bring people together to talk about issues that issue THEM.



|
Hail to King Google, but why?
logo
Google grabbed 25% of the $15.7 billion companies spent for online ads last year. That's almost $4 billion for a web property where users spend less than 5% of their time. That's right, Internet users spend less than 5% of their time actually searching the rest of the time they are visiting their favorite sites via bookmarks. One has to wonder if marketers are actually thinking about the way their customers use the Web?


OK, when searching for health information people will probably tend to use a search engine but actually we are seeing some trends that indicate that online health seekers are becoming more frustrated with search engines. I heard this loud and clear at my last research when diabetics said that when tried to search for information on diabetes they were bombarded with ads for everything from ED drug pharmacies to diabetic supply stores. Yes there are ways to refine searches and narrow the criteria but remember the Internet is a relatively new channel that people are still learning.

Now consider some of the new models of behavioral targeting that are emerging. According to a recent article in Business 2.0 some models can tell more about you than you could write in a 1000 word essay. They know what sites you visit, how long you stay, what stories you click on and can run optimizers that run 5000 to 10000 calculations to evaluate online ad campaigns. They can tell you if more people clicked on a blue background of your ad than a red one..if the ad with the man was more responsive or the ad with the woman. This ability to laser target is what the Internet has always been about it's just that marketers are finally getting into better ROI models because their shrinking budgets demand more accountability.

Should you allocate of 25% of your online media budget to search? That depends on a lot of criteria such as awareness of the disease state and brand but remember that Google can sell your brand name to other advertisers as well for paid search. The new models of behavioral targeting being offered by Microsoft and Yahoo are certainly the right step but marketers have to become a lot more savvy in describing their audience. We can't simply go by demographics anymore we need a detailed psychographics profile or our target audience.

This author feels that Google has a great product and will continue to evolve but I think they will find that the laws of gravity apply to them and their stock price will come way back down to earth. In the meantime try and think like your customers before deciding to allocate dollars on search. It may save you a lot of money and make you look like a hero.
|
Web MD: The only game in town?
screenshot_01
Am I the only person that thinks that the only thing Web MD has going for it is it's name? I recently went to Web MD to look up some medical information and I have to say that the web design is among the worst that I have ever seen. Way too many calls to action..no way to narrow searches and information that at times is dated. They should be looking in their rear view mirror because they are ripe for a competitor to come along and trounce them.



I have worked with Web MD many times and found that they can "be a legend in their own mind". They claim to be to be the ultimate health portal on the Web and, while numbers show them in the top 5, my experience has found that the ROI they provide is not always the best it could be. When I do an online media campaign I am not interested in impressions or clicks. I only want to pay for cost per targeted action within my target audience. Pay for performance can be challenging to a lot of online media properties but in these times of shrinking budgets I need to get a high ROI in order to get continued funding. There are a wealth of sites out there who can and do deliver pay for performance models and so far my experience with these sites has been really positive (if you want to know which sites just
send me an eMail)


Web MD does provide a destination for people who are looking for health-information but I also want to reach people who are caregivers and may not be in a health seeking mode with my brand message. The costs that Web MD charges can start in the low to mid six figures and go well into the millions depending upon the program that you chose. To their credit Web MD will work with you to develop a program that meets your objectives but you have to understand what your audience behavior is online and take the message to where they are not where you think they will be.


One thing that I feel Web MD desperately needs is a redesigned web site that is more user friendly. People don't read web pages they scan and there is just too much going on within the Web MD pages..too many calls to action and at times the site is confusing. They had better continue to evolve because it's only a matter of time before another site comes along and gets it right.
|
Physicians portal embraces Web 2.0
screenshot_02
Welcome to the only online community where physicians around the nation exchange the latest medical insights with each other and improve patient outcome. So says the tag-line on Sermo.com a physicians portal where physicians can talk and interact with each other online. What a novel idea...actually using the web to connect the HCP community.
Welcome to the only online community where physicians around the nation exchange the latest medical insights with each other and improve patient outcome. So says the tag-line on Sermo.com a physicians portal where physicians can talk and interact with each other online. What a novel idea...actually using the web to connect the HCP community.


Here is a summary of an article that recently ran on Cnn's Money about Sermo.com ;


Sermo was founded earlier this year by Dr. Daniel Palestrant. The surgeon noticed that many doctors saw the red flags for Merck's flawed painkiller Vioxx and Medtronic's dysfunctional pacemakers long before they turned into major scandals in the mainstream press. "We knew about these [problems,] but we didn't know how important they were," said Sermo chief executive Dr. Palestrant, based in Cambridge, Mass. "Maybe we could the get physicians themselves to determine what's important and what it isn't."



Dr. Palestrant noticed that doctors chatted with other doctors as they walked the halls of hospitals and clinics, but they didn't have an efficient way of reaching the wider medical community. That's why he created Sermo, which is describes as the biggest online physicians' community in the world. "What's motivating physicians is their desire to communicate with one another," said Dr. Palestrant. "So far, the biggest motivator that's causing physicians to log onto the site is for physicians to say, 'I'm seeing this,' or 'I'm seeing that.'"



Dr. Palestrant said many of the drug-related online comments focus on unapproved and off-label uses for FDA-approved drugs. and Sermo also serves a tool for physicians to compare notes on the possibility of dangerous or unusual side effects in commonly used drugs Doctors talk about antidepressants that seem to cause rashes, statins that seem linked to cognitive problems, and vitamins that might be causing lumps. "It there's smoke, there's fire," said Dr. Palestrant. "There's something that needs to be done here. This is sort of the zeitgeist.

"

Doctors vote, in a Netflix-style five-star system, on their level of interest in various medical topics. They also answer multiple-choice questions about their opinions on questions posed by other doctors. Discussion topics have titles like "Lipitor nightmares," a reference to Pfizer's top-selling statin, "FDA warning on Tamiflu," referring to the bird flu anti-viral from Roche Holding (Charts), and "Viagra vs. Levitra vs. Cialis," a comparison of sexual dysfunction treatments.



Doctors pitch questions and test theories, and anonymity is protected. A physician going by the moniker docDecaf wanted to know what other doctors thought about inoculating girls with Merck's (up $0.10 to $44.75, Charts) Gardasil, a newly-approved vaccine for a sexually-transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer, in patients as young as three. The purpose of inoculating at a young age is to make sure the girls are protected long before they become sexually active. The FDA has approved the vaccine for girls as young as nine. But another doctor wrote into Sermo, saying that three years is too young because the vaccine's protection is believed to last 10 years, so its potency would run out before most girls become sexually active

.

Not all the topics are serious. One of the online surveys asks doctors to vote for their favorite fictional doctor. The ballot includes Dr. Mark Greene of "ER," Dr. Gregory House of "House," and even Hannibal Lecter from "Silence of the Lambs." Dr. "Bones" McCoy of "Star Trek" is a write-in. At least 2,000 doctors are posting questions and voting on the site, said Dr. Palestrant, who noted that only physicians are allowed to participate and they're not charged for the service. The privately held company makes its money by charging institutional investors for the right to see the results on physician votes as they're coming in. The investors don't vote. "As long as you're a licensed physician, you can put whatever you want on the site," said Dr. Palestrant. "What's important is what your colleagues think."



Dr. Palestrant said he hasn't taken money from any drug companies so far, though that could change because he's in negotiations with them. The drug makers wouldn't be allowed to weigh in on surveys. But Dr. Palestrant said that physicians seem to prefer a Web site free from Big Pharma influence. Fran Hawthorne, author of "The Merck Druggernaut" and "Inside the FDA," said she wasn't familiar with Sermo, but an online forum is a great way for physicians to learn about side effects, as well as off-label uses not approved by the FDA, which account for about half of all prescriptions.



"[Doctors] find out through trial and error and schmoozing, so they need more communication, to find out about the good and the bad," said Hawthorne. Hawthorne said doctors could benefit from any source of pharmaceutical information "without it being a seminar from a drug company." But she suggested that anyone using the Internet as a source of information should adopt a healthy dose of cynicism. "Who's got an ax to grind?" said Hawthorne. "That's always the danger of the Internet. But in general it's a good idea, because you have doctors who presumably know what they're doing."


screenshot_01


This is great site and one shows what one person with vision can do on the Web to connect with physicians. As younger physicians enter the workplace they are going to be more tech savvy than their counterparts and will be looking for ways to embrace technology to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs. Too bad that pharma hasn't learned this yet as usual they are way behind the curve.

|
Pharma continues to neglect the web
42-17135946
Well according to industry media spending on DTC the total percentage of dollars allocated to the web was just 1%. While I believe that the reported number is low, it is probably closer to 4-5%, it still tells me that most pharma DTC marketing people are living in the past and don't understand this unique channels ability to drive Rx behavior.


There are a lot of ways to spend money on the Internet. Search engine marketing, online advertising, eCRM programs and website development and upgrades can all add up to a lot of money yet pharma marketers would rather spend millions of dollars developing TV ads and testing messages for TV rather than allocate more money for the Web. This tells me that they don't understand how to measure their web initiatives and don't understand that web analytics can provide a picture of who is visiting their website, what they are looking at and the effect of a website visitor on intent to ask for a prescription. These analytics are all available and can be a valuable tool for marketers but they just don't don't get it.

As I have written previously on this site big world class marketers like P&G, Budweiser and Chrysler are all allocating less money to TV and more to the Web. Why? Because over the years they know that costs of TV have continues to rise, viewer-ship has declined and that TV does not provide the best ROI today. However, what really scares me is pharma marketers continued ignorance of today's empowered consumers. Consumers today have information available to them 24/7/365, talk to each other via consumer generated media, and mistrust marketers messages. Yet pharma marketers continue to push messages to consumers rather than engage them..they prefer to air horrible TV spots like Rozarem's "your dreams want you back" rather than think about talking to consumers one on one.

The lack of talent in DTC marketing is scary and I think it's time for pharma to start tapping some consumer marketing people to bring new life into DTC advertising. When I first started in the DTC world my manager told me "you need to learn more about DTC marketing" and my response was "no, DTC marketing needs to learn more from consumer marketing". Too bad that message is still true today.
|