First it was DTC ads driving unneeded Rx's..now it's don't trust your doctor?
Lawmakers view of prescription medications: We must protect the public
Pharma PR: Who do you trust?
Ship Amgen sailing out of the storm
Lawmakers: The public is stupid when it comes to Rx drugs

Can for profit healthcare succeed when they don't control costs?
Listening to consumers on social media and the drug industry
Expert: Cialis & Viagra ads miss the mark??
In the latest issue of Business Week, all about marketing to Boomers, BusinessWeek asked industry veterans Brent Bouchez, David Page, and Nancy McNally—who recently formed the Five0 agency to help companies reach the 50+ audience—to give their views of some recent campaigns. One of the campaigns reviewed is the Cialis campaign and as you can see they didn’t like. However what the author is missing is that U.S. sales of Cialis were $149.1 million in the first quarter, a 21 percent increase compared with the first quarter of 2008, driven by higher prices, increased demand, and the favorable impact of wholesaler buying patterns.
Read More...What is real and what is not in the healthcare speech last night
Should the drug industry reach out to influencers?
Should you dive into social media?
The great healthcare debate...
Wellpoint drops half of branded Rx medications: will patients object?
Why does the drug industry spend so little online?
Drug companies and social media: Is there a match?
I hate the drug industry !! Why people hate the drug industry...
Why do drugs cost so much and is it true that doctors can't say no?
The real victims of government health care will be American patients
The future of DTC marketing
Socialized medicine: Do a law professors arguments make sense? No ! We're already there
The normal critique of socialized medicine is to point out that people have to wait a long time for . . . treatments in places like Britain. And that's certainly a valid critique . .The key point, though, is that these treatments didn't just come out of the blue. They were developed by drug companies and device makers who thought they had a good market for things that would make people feel better.
But under a national healthcare plan, the "market" will consist of whatever the bureaucrats are willing to buy. That means treatment for politically stylish diseases will get some money, but otherwise the main concern will be cost-control. More treatments, to bureaucrats, mean more costs . . . .
It's ironic that the same Democrats who were pushing the medical prospects for stem-cell research during the last election are now pushing a program that will make such progress far less likely.
Excuse me Mr Reynolds but we are already there ! Read More...
Prasugrel: Insurers may dictate strict use
Innovation in business models is more important for success than innovation in products and services.
Read More...
Health Insurance consumers: "Why should I pay the same premium as someone who smokes?"
Depressed ? Instead of a prescription maybe your vitamin D levels are low
ROI: We don't need no ROI !
The FDA is doing little to inform and educate for Rx and OTC products alike
Physicians: Pharma websites missing key information












