Lilly's Prasugrel: the good news and the bad news
There are a number of challenges now facing Lilly with this product:
1. Will the FDA require more clinical trials potentially delaying approval a couple of years or more?
2. Will pharmacy managers and health care providers allow Prasurgel in their formularies when Plavix comes off patent in 2011?
3. Will the FDA approve Prasurgel but require a "black box warning"?
Given what has been happening with the FDA recently
this author feels that the FDA will require Lilly to
conduct additional clinical trials on the drug before
approval. Some analysts also speculate that the
excess bleeding raises enough concern that the FDA
could require additional research before granting
market approval. "It's nonapprovable without another
clinical trial," said Mike Krensavage, an analyst at
Raymond James Financial Inc., worried that the
finding of a significant increase in fatal bleeding
-- 0.4% of prasugrel patients, compared with 0.1% of
those on Plavix -- will require more studies. Concern
about the drug last month led a Morgan Stanley
analyst to lower forecast sales for prasugrel.
Yesterday, following the presentation, analysts from
Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. followed suit.
If Lilly had to resubmit data to the FDA to get
approval for Cialis I just can't see how the FDA
would approve Prasurgel without requiring more data
as well. Yes there are benefits of this product over
Plavix but the FDA has to get this approval right,
for if there are issues after this drug is approved
you know that the finger will be squarely pointed at
the FDA and heads will roll.

