First there was ED now is pharma trying to convince people they hace UC?
The Website for Lialda is done very well. The home page quickly communicates the key brand messages and there is a lot of information for sufferers to read including patient stories. The free 30 day offer also pops out at you and overall the site is clean, functional and well laid out. With such a small target however, I personally would not be running ads on Websites like the NY Post. This requires a more targeted approach and I would definitely be looking a behavioral targeting model for general sites. Shire's ads are also running on Web MD inside the UC section.

The site is well laid out and the uplifting lifestyle
image creates a feeling of patient empowerment
What really impresses me, however, is that Shire has
decided to USE the WEB for the launch of this product
! What a great idea. The fact that they are doing
ANYTHING on the Web puts them ahead of other pharma
companies in a big way. For metrics they can measure
how many people clicked on their banners and what
pages they went to and how many downloaded the free
trial. If they used the correct programming metrics
they could even analyze how man people redeemed a
coupon for a free Rx from coming to their site from
an online ad and what site they came from.

Yeah there is a credibility issue with patient
stories but people ARE going
to read them in deciding if this product is right for
them.
I noticed that on the site they have converted
ulcerative colitis to UC. That might be pushing it a
little...you don't want people going to the doctor
and saying "I think my ED might have caused my UC
which in turn has lead to HBP". Still it is a great
first step now if Shire could find a way to act as
aggregators online to bring these people together and
have them discuss what works and what doesn't work
they would really have a winner.


